Tyre reviews Cordiant Sport. Page 1 116

I bought 2 first, put on some small cracks and cuts on the sides over the season, not bad considering the off-road driving, on the second year I bought a few more, put them on the front - not one flaw for the season, only drive on asphalt and like on railroad tracks. The hubs are fine, but the tires are square and at 120-140 km/h I don't feel any bounce, but the growl starts at 50 km and it's not the

I picked up (175/70) at the market, came home, and looked up reviews about the tires online... and was floored by mediocre and openly disappointing reviews. I was guided by the tire's classy tread pattern and the quality of the winter Cordiant, which lasts for two seasons without wearing out, it's amazing. I'll admit it, I've been dragging them to the tire shop, I've installed them, and waited for 40 tires to wear them out in all places

Tires simply great!!!! Minimum wear for a season, even with intensive city driving,,,, big plus in rainy conditions, keeps the car on great.

Normal tire

I've driven almost 10,000 km on it and I'm quite satisfied. The wear is very small. It handles the road well and enters turns at speed without complaints. And it brakes excellent, even on wet markings, I specifically tried it. I drive a Toyota Camry, which is almost 2 tons, so those guys who talk about the "goono" are either showing off or driving on trash. And the one who wrote about poor balancing, let him

For the price, the tire is super. In general, super. There's a minor issue with balancing, but that's for the fitters.
The asphalt rating is 5+, the on-water rating is 5, and it throws water to the side. Prior to this, the Avto, Gislaved, and Nokian were creating fountains and behaving worse.
Now, I've got around 40,000 km on it. In another

The tire was very badly out of balance, problems started and it was veering to the right, the steering was going out of alignment and I struggled to make adjustments, only to find out that one of the rear tires was severely worn down on the right side.

G is complete

if on wet it's somehow, but on dry it just doesn't brake - overheats, floats, then it's like on ice. Having tried this G, I evaluated Camu 208, it's really worse than Camu 208. Manufacturers should be held accountable. There's no point in describing its positive properties, as a drop of honey in a barrel of G won't fix anything. THE RUBBER DOESN'T BRAKE!!!

Noisey. Braking could be better. From a standstill quite confident, almost no wheelspin or screech. Easy to enter corners. After 120 km some minor vibration - balance is fine. On a wet road it performs well.

For comparison.

Earlier I had an imported tyre Nokian model not remembered. Compared to Nokian has disadvantages in braking and noise.

Advantages on wet asphalt, mud, acceleration from a standstill, cornering and durability and price.

Went on them for 3 years, almost 60,000 km and still had a year left!!! Road is SUPER well-maintained, no skids on wet asphalt, even on puddles, and on the highway at 120 km/h with 5 cm deep potholes and 2 meters long, was not a big skid, all ok, I managed to get out of it, but it's not safe to drive like this!!! Everything else is SUPER about the tires

Honestly, the tires are very poor. They can't grip the road at all on wet asphalt! At a speed of 55 km/h, they skidded at almost new condition (with a mileage of 450 km). The noise level is average. They are very stiff. Aquaplaning occurred at a speed of 78-80 km/h. They are difficult to steer. They are on my Scenic and I obviously don't drive aggressively, especially with the family,