Continental ContiCrossContact AT

  • Continental ContiCrossContact AT
    Continental ContiCrossContact AT

Tire specifications

Manufacturer
Continental (Германия)
Group
Continental
Vehicle type
Jeeps and SUVs
Seasonality
All-season
On sale since
2010 г.
Tire class
A
Tire type
A/T
Fuel consumption
E...F
Handling
C...E
Noisiness
71...75
Description

Not available 50

Modification
Continental ContiCrossContact AT 205/70 R15 96T
not available
Continental ContiCrossContact AT 205/75 R15 97T
not available
Continental ContiCrossContact AT 205/75 R15 97S
not available
Continental ContiCrossContact AT LT215/80 R15 111/109S
not available
Continental ContiCrossContact AT 225/70 R15 100S
not available
Continental ContiCrossContact AT 225/75 R15 102S
not available
Continental ContiCrossContact AT 235/75 R15 109T
not available
Continental ContiCrossContact AT 235/75 R15 109S XL
not available
Continental ContiCrossContact AT LT245/75 R15 109/107S
not available
Continental ContiCrossContact AT 255/70 R15 108S
not available
Recommended 91%

Reviews 106

Add a feedback
Dry road
Wet road
Snow
Ice
Comfort
Course stability
Silent
Braking
Aquaplaning
Speed
Wearability
Quality
Price/performance
4.03 / 5
  • about tyre Continental ContiCrossContact AT

    Rate
    4.5

    I've been driving my new Chevrolet Niva LE on these tires, with a current mileage of 26,900 km. The tire has proven itself excellent on both asphalt and off-road, with a 50/50 split between on-road and off-road driving, both in winter and summer. On asphalt, it's relatively quiet (the Niva's transfer case is louder). It handles wet roads well.

    Vehicle:
    Chevrolet Niva  1,8L  2000-2008
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Continental ContiCrossContact AT

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    3.8

    A pretty decent tire in terms of price and traction. Used for 2 summers - clay, spongy fields - all great, within reason, of course, since it is an AT. Don't even try to go out in the winter; even four-wheel drive won't save you; the tire is purely for the summer. Hard compound, 4 mm tread depth. The only downside is that it collects stones in the tread.

    Vehicle:
    Toyota Hilux
    Size:
    265/65 R17 112T
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Moscow
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Continental ContiCrossContact AT

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    3.5

    Good all-terrain tyres for daily driving. Strong and comfortable. Mud unsets quickly, as expected. Medium wear life, expensive price. Used on various surfaces (rocks, sand, mud and long asphalt runs).

    Vehicle:
    Chevrolet Niva
    Size:
    215/65 R16 98T
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Самара
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability

Tests 3

  • Summer tire test 265/65 R17 7

    Publisher:
    «DriveOut»
    Year:
    2017
    Dry handling braking distance: 23.77
    Points: 85.03
    Off-road: 22.27
    Durability: 13.99
  • Off-road tire test, size 265/65 R17 8

    Publisher:
    «DriveOut»
    Year:
    2014
    Continental failed to meet expectations, possibly because they are more oriented towards asphalt driving. De Villiers praised them for their ride quality and added that they are <stable and steady>.

    Score: 168.42
  • All-terrain tyre test 265/75 R16 5

    Publisher:
    «Авторевю»
    Year:
    2015
    Low rolling resistance
    comfort
    on-road handling
    traction on sand and gravel.
    Extremely low traction properties in mud
    low traction properties on grass
    Out of rating

    The tires were included in the out-of-competition test program to demonstrate the fundamental differences between more versatile all-terrain tires of the AT (All Terrain) class and mud tires of the MT (Mud Terrain) class. And they succeeded! On the mud section, the car in the rear-wheel drive version could not reach the necessary 20 km/h for measurement. However, in the other disciplines, tires with a less aggressive and not so deep tread pattern showed very worthy results. On gravel, the tires are even the best! And on sand, they "dig" well. On such "fine-grained" surfaces, a more saturated rubber tread works better than the aggressive lugs of MT-class tires. And surprisingly, on asphalt, the tires lost to several models of the main rating. That is, it's not a fact that MT-class tires definitely lose to AT tires on asphalt. It all depends on specific models and manufacturers. Although in terms of comfort and ease of rolling, these tires are clearly preferable.

    Score: 7.85

Video 1