Summer tire test 205/55 R16 from the publisher За рулём 2009 p.
Place
Model
Description / Recommendations
Cost
1
Best wet braking performance Best lateral grip and aquaplaning performance and excellent handling
Poor braking on dry asphalt Increased fuel consumption at 90 km/h Minor remarks on directional stability and comfort level
Strongly recommended for roads with good surface quality. Will be appreciated by those who value stability of characteristics in any weather.
—
2
High combination of lateral grip and wet features on any surface Good handling on wet surface High comfort level
Minor handling notes when performing a switch on dry pavement and directional stability
Highly recommended for any paved roads. Will be appreciated by those who value stability of characteristics in any weather.
—
3
Excellent combination of lateral characteristics and water features High comfort level Good cornering stability
Increased fuel consumption at 90 km/h Minor remarks on handling when performing a lane change on any road surface
Strongly recommended for any paved roads. Will appeal to those who value stability of characteristics in any weather.
—
4
Excellent braking on wet conditions, Low fuel consumption at any speed, High wet and dry handling balance
Minor notes on noise and handling on dry pavement High tire stiffness
Highly recommended for high-quality road surfaces. Will appeal to those who value every drop of gasoline.
—
5
Excellent wet braking performance Easy to drive on dry surfaces Low noise level
High fuel consumption at any speed
Minor handling remarks when performing a lane change on a wet surface
Straight line stability and ride smoothness
Highly recommended for roads with good surface quality.
—
6
Top dry braking Very good wet braking
Poor handling on wet surfaces Minor remarks on directional stability, handling on dry surfaces and comfort level
Recommended for roads with good surface quality.
from 6 740 ₽
7
Excellent wet braking performance, good cornering stability
Weak brakes on wet surface Increased fuel consumption at 90 km/h Difficult handling when performing lane change on wet surface
Recommended for roads with good surface quality.
—
8
Excellent stopping performance on wet pavement
Complex handling on dry pavement High noise level Minor remarks on directional stability, handling on wet pavement and ride smoothness
Recommended for any road.
—
9
Smooth ride, low noise
Unconvincing combination of cross-grip properties and aquatic characteristics on a wet surface
Increased fuel consumption at any speed
When performing a rearrangement, complex handling on a dry surface and problematic — on a wet one
Recommended for all paved roads.
from 24 430 ₽
10
Good combination of cornering grip and wet characteristics on dry surface High fuel efficiency at any speed Good directional stability
Worst braking performance on any surface Low lateral properties and aqua characteristics Problematic handling on wet pavement
Recommended for roads with good quality coating. Will suit those who value fuel efficiency.
—
11
Excellent dry braking Excellent cornering stability
Problematic handling on dry and wet surfaces High stiffness Increased fuel consumption
Recommended only for very good roads.
—