Tyre reviews Windforce Catchfors H/P. Страница 7 17208

The tire is excellent, it behaves predictably, it's quiet, it handles puddles without any issues, and aquaplaning is minimal (of course, if you hit a puddle with one side at 90 km/h, it will pull, but not strongly and evenly). When I first got it, I was surprised by its softness, but after 4 months, it's been flying normally. Most likely, I'll buy it again, as the price-to-quality ratio is still fully satisfactory.

Terrible quality, very strong vibration that cannot be balanced, I thought such specialists would know better, I changed three tire shops and the answer from all of them is the same "Poor tires". They were imposed on me like a child, it's even offensive. Unfortunately, during the warranty period, I did not have the opportunity to identify the director and return the product.

Good tires, stored properly, no problems with balancing, hold the road perfectly, especially wet one, I recommend for purchase)

I purchased two 195/65/15 tires, one of which was balanced perfectly, while the other was not balanced as well, but it doesn't affect driving, it's just that I carry a lot of weight. I don't drive aggressively, usually at 100-110 km/h. I installed them on the front wheels (the car is front-wheel drive). Most of my driving is on highways. The tread depth of the new tires could have been made a bit deeper. They are not stable in the groove, so you need to be careful, and if there's water in the groove, you need to be three times more careful. It's too early to talk about wear. The mileage is around 15,000 km, and if they last for 60-80 thousand km, it would be good, although it's unlikely. Now, all tires are from China, so if they last for 60,000 km, it would be possible to continue buying them, because if you buy only South Korean tires, they will probably last for 120,000 km, but they would cost twice as much. That's my opinion. On the rear axle, I have two Bridgestone tires, used, with 4-5 mm of remaining tread. I think they will outlast two sets of Chinese tires on the front wheels. It's too early to decide about the Chinese tires. I'm not sure if I would buy them again, it depends on how they perform in the long run. I replaced two Bridgestone tires with Chinese ones because they had lateral vibration. The mileage on the Bridgestones was very high, my son didn't record it, but it was a lot. I left two Bridgestone tires on the rear wheels because they don't have lateral vibration yet and the wear is still acceptable. If you find Japanese Bridgestone tires, then of course, buy them, they cost twice as much, but they will definitely not disappoint.

Excellent tires for my car, I took winter studs of the same brand, the dynamics of the car changed, handling, soft rubber is comfortable 100%. I liked the set.

I've been driving on them for the second season. I drive a lot.

By the second summer, they didn't balance very well. Considering the St. Petersburg summer of 2025, when roads are like rivers, they drain water very well. Overall, I have a good impression of them.

Tires hold the road well, very pleased in heavy rain at 110km/h on the track on the highway aquaplaning was absent.

Overall, everything is fine. I drive a Matiz, and those who drive one know that the front wheels are cambered, while the rear axle is at zero degrees, so here's the point. The rear wheels have zero wear, but the front ones, by the feel of it, will not last more than 2 seasons, it's like they're wearing out quickly.

The price matches the quality. Previously, I drove on Continental Premium, Chinese ones are softer, need to get used to them a bit.

With a calm driving style, the tires performed excellent. The resistance to aquaplaning was particularly pleasing, even surprising. The only drawback is the noise, now I'm thinking of noise reduction for the wheel arches. Overall, from a Chinese product, and the cheapest one at that, I didn't expect such a positive result. How it will perform with sharp and aggressive driving, that's a question.