Tyre reviews Matador MP-92 Sibir Snow M+S. Page 7 108

Price/quality excellent.

Satisfied. Everything's alright.

Good price-quality ratio. Holds the road perfectly, no aquaplaning tendency, quiet, I would recommend. During the time of use, I did not notice any drawbacks.

Good tires, satisfied with the purchase.

Despite their price, one of the lowest among winter tyres, it turned out to be a very good tyre. I have not experienced any problems either in the Moscow snowfall of this year or in relatively strong frosts and black ice. Compared to Bridgestones, which I had before, I find the Matador to be even better, at least I can now drive into such slush in which I previously, despite my full four-wheel drive and various locks, would be spinning wildly.

I bought these tires and I'm not regretting it, the car holds the road confidently, it's really good on snow and it drives very stably on both ice and at a relatively high speed.

Hello! Honestly, I didn't expect such positive results from these "mud-grip" tires. Never wore such before, always preferred studded tires! Especially, since my "Cayron" has permanent all-wheel drive, ie. the front is connected. Noise insulation is at the highest level, I didn't feel any difference between summer and winter tires! On icy roads, the ABS kicked in on the downhill, but it also creaked on the previous studded tires. Another

Advantages:
- price
- quality
- minimum load when balancing
- quiet
- performed well both on snowy roads and on "mud"
- made in Slovenia
Disadvantages: - unclear behavior on packed snow and ice
Bought a set for 16,000 rubles at the end of 2015, size 225/75/16. And I took it for the reason of the absence of noise

End of season, normal flight.

It's performing well so far, a bit noisy, but overall it was a good experience.