Tyre reviews Kumho Ecsta HS51. Page 4 557

My old Kumho Solus has served me for 8 years from 2012 to 2020. No need to think twice about choosing a new tyre... Kumho all the way!!!

Good tires, well-balanced in rain. Grip and brakes are like on dry asphalt at 140 km/h. A bit longer braking distance in hot weather, a bit of hydroplane, but otherwise a new brand is doing great.

Quiet and durable enough for normal commuting use. Some noticeable wear, but we'll see how it goes.

All good. Soft and quiet.

Since the car is not very quiet, I prioritized quietness. I read the reviews, bought them, and indeed they are quiet! Also, they are relatively soft, pass over irregularities well and behave at high speeds. I've driven half of Europe, 6,000 km, and I'm still satisfied. Accelerated up to 160 and it was great to drive.

As for wear resistance, I don't know yet, it's my first season with

Purchased last year, all impressions are positive. Despite bad roads, we didn't have any problems with the tyres, even hitting rather big potholes. It holds the road confidently.

Tire is entirely responsible.

Read reviews and decided to try these tires on my "sweetie". Specifically, I'll say that I haven't had a chance yet, as I've only driven less than 500 km, but in terms of noise, I'll say that it's significantly quieter than the Bridgestone equivalent. As for performance in different weather conditions, I'm confident that they will not disappoint, and production quality is also impressive, being made in South Korea!

Noisy, otherwise no complaints, good tires for the price.

Before, there were Mickey tires HRS. I've installed Kumho. In my opinion, there's no difference. If there's no difference, why pay twice as much for a Mickey?) I recommend. Moderate exploitation. Not a racing style. Moderate driving in the city and up to 180 on the track.