Tyre reviews Kumho Power Star 758. Page 1 66

Took it B/U, don't know what mileage it had. Installed it on the rear axle. After Camac 217, it's just super! It doesn't hydroplane and handles wet roads perfectly. On dry roads, it's also not bad. Didn't use it in winter. Didn't notice much noise (Camac 217 is noisier). Of course, it's not perfect, but a reasonable combination of price and quality, considering I bought it used for 500

Negative
The car was equipped with TACUMA CHEVROLET. Barely passed 45,000 km. After 40,000 km, sidewall bulges appeared, after 44,000 km, the cord was exposed on one wheel. On dry asphalt, they are slightly noisy, on shallow wet snow, it's very difficult to start moving from a standstill.
Pros: low noise
Cons: not durable, poor traction on wet snow

Normal Tread. It behaves confident on all roads. Never disappointed.

The tires went with the car. We ran 80,000 km and 3 seasons, and there was still one season left. On one of the five, a crack appeared somewhere in the middle of the run. Wear resistance is simply phenomenal. Afraid of puddles and potholes.

Large handling tire for a great price, I would definitely order again.

This is a good tire for a reasonable price. I haven't had much experience driving in the snow with these tires, but aside from that they seem like they will be good for any weather conditions.

On dry roads, it's nothing special, but the noise...

I got it by chance. It seems like this tire is standard for small Hyundai cars. It handles dry asphalt well, braking is good, but on wet roads, God forbid... it behaves unpredictably, but it never hydroplaned. I'd rather not comment on dirt or sand roads... The biggest downside is the noise. It starts at very low speeds, and since my car has almost no soundproofing,

Good tires at an off-schedule price