Tyre reviews Kumho Ecsta PS71. Page 42 939

Good tires! Optimal price and quality ratio!

Very good tires! Optimal ratio of price and quality!

Normal tire for its money. Noisier than Bridgestone, but more comfortable on grooves. I bought different widths - front 215/45 17, rear 245/40 17. I was very disappointed that the front was "made in China", the rear is made in Korea.

Great tire!!! I remained satisfied!!!

At one time, I read a lot of positive reviews and bought this Korean production optimization product.

Spoiler - for such money, the tire is terrible. When I put it on and drove on the highway, at first, I didn't even understand - I thought a plane was flying over me (the airport is nearby, St. Petersburg). It turned out to be nothing - this "plane" was just the tire. To understand, they are louder than my studded winter tires. Okay, I drive further... In the process of driving, I exited the KAD and strongly understeered - it felt like the car was slipping. I slowed down, wiped the sweat, and drove slowly. By the way, before that, I had tires from the same company, but Solus, and I didn't have any questions about those tires. So I drove as I was used to. I had to get used to it. Turns can only be made slowly, at 30-40 km/h. If it's raining, we're not in a hurry. Adhesion - oh, what a passion - we drive slowly, looking around, so that in case of a skid, we cause less damage to ourselves.

Someone here wrote that after 1000 km, it becomes less noisy. Don't believe it - it's the same devil screaming from hell.

As for wear... One season (which hasn't ended yet) and I already see it. I'll say right away - I only drive on highways and in the city, I don't drive on dirt roads.

I don't know what to associate with such... mediocre... quality of such a famous company, but... what is, is. "Optimization" has reached the Land of Morning Freshness.

I regret that I was swayed by the company and paid a lot of money. It would be better to pay "small" money and buy Chinese tires. In terms of quality, I think it would be the same, but I would save half the money. Or I would pay an extra couple of thousand and buy something better. But... is there anything better? Even Michelin is being criticized. Where can a simple person go?

If only I could try it on, wear it, and then make a choice...

The only thing that's clear is that all these stars in the ratings are complete nonsense, and it's not worth relying on them. Only listen to acquaintances and buy proven products.

Excellent summer tires, not noisy. They behave well in both rain and heat. Comfortable on the highway and in the city. No complaints. I've been driving for three months. The quality is no worse than Continental, and the price is more attractive. I drove Continental for four seasons, they were terribly noisy in the heat.

I previously installed Kumho tires on my Citroen C5. I was pleased with the Korean tires. When it was time to replace the tires on my Ford, I didn't hesitate for long. The combination of price and quality, with its softness - a sturdy sidewall, doesn't "float" when changing lanes. Resistant to aquaplaning. In terms of wear resistance, it's a solid middle ground. Energetic start from the traffic light without wheel spin on clean asphalt. Not suitable for drift enthusiasts.

Excellent tires. They grip well in puddles, hold the car well. Not noisy. Soft. Very pleased.

I've been driving on these tires for 2 seasons, with a mileage of about 40,000. They are wear-resistant, not noisy, and handle the road wonderfully

Quite quiet, not expensive. I enjoyed driving on it