Tyre reviews Grenlander L-Zeal56. Page 2 111

I like the tires; they grip the road well and there's no aquaplaning. I don't know how long they'll last—I've only driven 5000 km on them so far. No complaints yet.

Начитался положительных отзывов и купил себе это чудо. Мое мнение: искал резину в достаточно редком размере колеса и из вариантов было либо эта либо "мишка" в 5 раз дороже, других, даже китайских альтернатив, не было. Почитав, что даже на М серию бНв ее ставят и очень хвалят, решил поставить на свой "овощной" авто. По итогу: в сухую погоду сцепление на грани, в дождь или лужи - точно не сто́ит привышать скорость! Зимой- само собой - это нельзя использовать. Если брать для мощной заднеприводной тачки, то только на отжиг или для раздачи углом на кольце, т.к. сцепления у этой резины с асфальтом нет вообще. На переднем приводе будете шлифовать всегда, если у вас чуть больше 150 сил). Я в целом не жалею о приобретении, ибо догадывался, что покупаю, она шумная в сравнении с Мишлен, но это и неудивительно. Рекомендую тем, кто передвигается по городу и не превышает скорость. Для гонщиков и тех, кто чувствует машину- это не ваше, ребят), для обычных пользователей авто в качестве передвижения по городу - можно брать и ездить строго по ПДД))) всем добра!

245/50 R19.
The tire performed 4/4+ in all disciplines. There was both track (dry, wet) and dirt and speeds of 180+.
Aquaplaning and wet road at 4, dry at 4+, handling at 4, surprisingly, it's not much worse on wet. What I consider the main drawback is that for such a size, the tire is not comfortable enough, it's a bit stiff and fuel consumption is roughly 0.5 liters higher compared to others.
After 8000 km, there's virtually no wear.
If your car is initially comfortable (some kind of crossover, for example) and in any case consumes a lot (some kind of crossover))), then for this price, it's a top tire! But if you count every gram of fuel and every bump your suspension handles, then it's not for you!)

Not a bad option, but on the highway at a speed of approximately 120 to 140 km/h, there is a slight vibration. At the tire shop, it's visible that the tire is slightly not "round" )) but according to the reviews of the same tire shop employee, this is not the worst option among those presented by China in our market. It handles wet roads well. For city driving, the tire is perfect. For the highway, I'd give it a 4, due to the slight vibration, but still, I drove 6000 km on it on vacation and back, and didn't get too stressed)

A bit noisy, but otherwise alright

Bought on the recommendation of colleagues, price-quality is quite satisfied, not noisy for sure, the second balancing after 500-600 km was no more than 20-30 grams, it holds the road very well, both on dry and wet asphalt, I deliberately didn't avoid puddles and there were no sharp jerks, so I recommend.

The tires are good. They hold the road well. They don't float in turns. After Nokian, it seemed that there was less noise. Although to each their own... The price-to-quality ratio is excellent. I'm not buying them for the first time. I bought a car from Europe with the same tires (they were on it from purchase), I've driven over 40,000 km. In my case, the most important thing is to monitor the tire pressure. I'm not imposing my opinion on anyone. It's just my opinion.

Before L-Zeal56 245/40/18 rear 275/35/18 tire is soft, suitable for city driving. But very noisy on the highway and directional stability is 3.

The tire balances perfectly, holds the road well, have driven 3000 km on mountain roads. Quality and price are super. I recommend.

Excellent tires, after 3-year-old Dunlop it's like a song, handles great, brakes well on both dry and wet asphalt, super. Quiet, although my Mercedes is also quiet, so that's subjective!

I recommend purchasing!