Summer tire test 205/55 R16 from the publisher За рулём 2011 p.
| Place |
Model |
Description / Recommendations |
Cost |
|
1
|
|
-
- Best stopping performance on wet, very good on dry
Excellent combination of lateral grip and steer response
Excellent handling
-
- Low level of comfort
Minor comments on high-speed directional stability
-
- Deliver driving pleasure on any road and allow you to stop in time.
Rating: 944
Price/Quality: 3.81
|
from 5 300 ₽ |
|
2
|
|
-
- Very good braking, balance of lateral traction properties and steering characteristics on any surface
Stably controlled in any mode
Economical
-
- Minor remarks on course stability and comfort
-
Suitable for any driving mode, while being economical.
Rating: 924
Price/Quality: 4.22
|
— |
|
3
|
|
-
- Excellent braking on wet road
Combination of traction characteristics and directional stability
Clearly holds course
Economical
-
- Minor remarks on handling in extreme modes on dry pavement and ride smoothness
-
- Will please when driving fast. Will not save on a wet road.
Score: 919
Price/Quality: 4.03
|
from 19 420 ₽ |
|
4
|
|
-
- Good braking
Smooth handling
Economical at high speeds
Silent
-
- Minor remarks on handling during turn and ride smoothness
-
- Will please on the highway at high speed.
Rating: 917
Price/Quality: 4.24
|
— |
|
5
|
|
-
- Good lap times
Good balanced lateral grip and understeer behaviour on dry roads
-
- Minor comments on handling during extreme maneuvering and comfort
Blisters on the sidewalls
-
- Suitable for any paved roads.
Points: 894
Price/Quality: 3.91
|
— |
|
6
|
|
-
- Excellent dry braking, very good wet.
-
- Poor handling during extreme maneuvering
Increased fuel consumption
-
- Suitable for any asphalt road at any driving mode.
Rating: 889
Price/Quality: 4.61
|
from 6 740 ₽ |
|
7
|
|
-
- Economical at 90 km/h
Quiet
Even in quality and rating
-
- Hard
-
- Suitable for any roads in any driving mode.
Score: 889
Price/Quality: 4.39
|
— |
|
8
|
|
-
- Mid braking performance on dry and wet roads
Handling on dirt roads is assured.
-
- Difficult handling when performing extreme maneuvers on dry land
-
- Suitable for any road at any driving mode.
Score: 873
Price/Quality: 3.21
|
— |
|
9
|
|
-
- Reasonably economical
Good handling during extreme maneuvers on dry pavement.
-
- Weak brakes on wet surfaces
Low ride smoothness
-
- Suitable for all roads and all driving modes.
Points: 872
Price/Quality: 3.67
|
— |
|
10
|
|
-
- Good durability
Low noise
-
- Weak braking
Problematic handling when switching on dry asphalt, complex on wet
-
- Will show their best qualities on long trips.
Rating: 861
Price/Quality: 3.14
|
from 4 340 ₽ |
|
11
|
|
-
- One of the most fuel-efficient in the test
Quiet
-
- Poor braking performance on wet surfaces
Low balance of lateral traction properties and steering characteristics
Difficult handling on wet surfaces
Harsh ride
-
- Will suit those who value fuel efficiency.
Rating: 858
Price/Quality: 4.31
|
— |
|
12
|
|
-
- Mud and water on the road
Smooth driving on dirt roads
-
- Weak brakes and problematic handling during extreme maneuvers on dry pavement, difficult on wet
Low directional stability and comfort level
-
- Suitable for urban and suburban driving modes on roads with good surface quality. Good on dirt roads.
Points: 840
Price/Quality: 3.21
|
— |
|
13
|
|
-
- Fuel-efficient at 90 km/h
Low noise
Economical for high-speed tyres
-
- The weakest braking properties
Problematic handling when switching on any coverage
Course stability
Low ride smoothness
-
- Suitable for slow movement in urban and suburban areas.
Score: 798
Price/Quality: 3.51
|
— |
