| Place |
Model |
Description / Recommendations |
Cost |
|
1
|
|
-
- Extremely safe and tacky on wet and dry road surfaces, easy to handle.
-
- Weak steering response, unsatisfactory rolling resistance, slightly unpredictable
-
- Rating: Recommended
Wet road: 9.0
Dry road: 9.0
Scores: 8.8
Environmental impact: 6.5
|
— |
|
2
|
|
-
- Above-average handling in turns, high traction on wet roads, intuitive steering response, and the lowest rolling resistance.
-
- Disadvantages of braking on a wet surface
-
- Rating: Recommended
Wet road: 8.4
Dry road: 8.7
Score: 8.6
Environmental impact: 9.4
|
from 7 040 ₽ |
|
3
|
|
-
- A very well-balanced tire with short braking distance on dry asphalt, easy to handle
-
- Insufficient wet traction, weak water channeling
-
- Rating: Recommended
Wet road: 7.9
Dry road: 9.3
Scores: 8.6
Environmental impact: 9.7
|
from 7 160 ₽ |
|
4
|
|
-
- Safe and stable handling on wet and dry roads, reliability when changing lanes, easy to use
-
- Worse cornering on dry pavement when driving downhill
-
- Rating: Recommended
Wet road: 8.8
Dry road: 7.7
Scores: 8.3
Environmental impact: 8.7
|
from 10 840 ₽ |
|
5
|
|
-
- Performance, dynamic and comfortable tire, best-in-class braking performance on wet surfaces.
-
- Weakness in dry braking and aquaplaning
-
- Rating: Recommended
Wet road: 8.6
Dry road: 8.3
Scores: 8.3
Environmental impact: 7.3
|
from 5 300 ₽ |
|
6
|
|
-
- Safe braking distance on wet and dry road, stability when changing lanes
-
- weak on wet roads compared to others, unpredictable handling at high speeds
-
- Rating: Recommended
Wet road: 7,8
Dry road: 9,3
Scores: 8,3
Environmental impact: 6,9
|
from 5 190 ₽ |
|
7
|
|
-
- Very safe on wet roads with short braking distance, best aquaplaning prevention.
-
- Drawbacks on dry braking, strong insufficient steerability with very short limit zone
-
- Rating: Recommended
Wet road: 9.1
Dry road: 7.2
Scores: 8.1
Environmental impact: 6.6
|
from 18 340 ₽ |
|
8
|
|
-
- Suitable for both wet and dry roads, dynamic on wet with good ultimate handling, intuitive on dry.
-
- Worse responds to handling on a wet road with a strong insufficient steering, worse on a dry one, high rolling resistance
-
- Rating: Recommended
Wet road: 7,9
Dry road: 8,0
Scores: 7,7
Environmental impact: 5,5
|
— |
|
9
|
|
-
- Good traction and handling on dry pavement, good rolling resistance, quiet
-
- Poor braking, excessive steering on a wet road, worse than average steering response
-
- Rating: Recommended
Wet road: 6,8
Dry road: 7,4
Scores: 7,1
Environmental impact: 7,6
|
— |
|
10
|
|
-
- Delivers exceptional handling and steering responsiveness.
-
- Satisfactory grip on wet and dry roads
-
- Rating: Conditionally recommended
Wet road: 6.8
Dry road: 7.0
Score: 6.9
Environmental impact: 6.6
|
from 3 320 ₽ |
|
11
|
|
-
- Good performance on dry surface, good comfort, silence
-
- Drawbacks include aquaplaning, poor traction on wet roads
-
- Rating: Conditionally recommended
Wet road: 6.0
Dry road: 7.1
Score: 6.5
Environmental impact: 7.2
|
from 16 650 ₽ |