Tyre reviews Roadstone Winguard 231 35

Wrote a review below last year. I'd like to say that I switched to Bridgestone stud this year, and it's like day and night, the car drives smoothly and predictably. Nexen is no longer a winter tire, the cornering stability is good, and the wear resistance is also good, but the other indicators are very low. So I'm disappointed.

Season 3 has begun. All to the tire's tip are intact. I bought them based on price vs quality. I can't say they're the best tires, but they have their advantages. The main plus is the comfort, especially when driving in a metropolis during winter, the tread is deep. In all turns, I entered, tried to get out of my trajectory, but always returned thanks to active steering, the slide on hilly roads was, but the car always managed to stop

I had 10 rubles in my pocket and went to choose tires, but what can I choose for 10 rubles? There were Amtel and other such nonsense! Friends who ride say, "Take the Rodstoun, you won't regret it!" I looked at the tires, the pattern pleased me, deep directional tread, lots of lamellae, checkers, plus there are studs on the factory! And there was snow and ice! The tires really pleased me, by

I also bought it by mistake. Went to the market with a certain amount of money (10000) thinking of buying a good tire, and the scammers sold me an unknown Roadstone. Looked at the tread - everything was fine: deep and asymmetrical studs. I handed over the money thoughtlessly. Until the first snowfall everything was fine, quietly drives on asphalt. But after the 2-weeks of rain, which hit our city in less than a day, it became scary

30 thousand miles driven on them for 2 years, including in warm weather, the tread is still very good, I highly recommend them in terms of price/quality and passability 5+ everywhere: both in snow and in slush, the tractor-like tread pattern is not like the crappy Hankook.

Great tire! Lexus GS-300 car

There is no noise from the wheels and no familiar clicking of the studs either. Pleasantly surprised. The rubber is very soft, at -15 frost it is pressed with a finger. And the price is reasonable, but they say it's even cheaper in Moscow.

Pluses: What is good about NEXEN is its studding - Finnish two-flange studs, they say they almost never come off. The tire holds

Snow will show... (put at the end of November c.r.)
Ford Sierra 2.0i DOHC, 1990
Pros: On turns - both on dry and wet asphalt - SUPER!
Cons: Hmm... Sharp braking (bringing the matter to wheel lock) on wet asphalt I STRONGLY DO NOT RECOMMEND!Rating:

The price-quality ratio is super!!!
The mileage is just over 5 thousand, but it has been in ice and snow and just on asphalt... The car is Lanos, tire size 175/70R13.
Pluses: The tire is quite quiet while driving, it goes through snowy slush like on dry asphalt, braking is excellent. No wear is visible yet....
Minuses: None have been identified so far...Rating:

Very pleased
BMW E30 1986, excellent value for money, not noisy, soft, holds the road perfectly, and in general, all good!!! The Koreans are great!!!
Pros: not too noisy even with studs
Cons: not identified

Below average

I bought them 4 days ago, but I've already had a chance to drive in heavy snow. On snow, I felt quite confident, on ice it was also pleasant to start moving, but this tire is very bad at braking on ice. In my opinion, a BEAR brakes better on ice! The lateral stability is quite decent, but on dry asphalt, the car doesn't drive perfectly straight - it wanders a bit from side to side, requiring a slight correction