Tyre reviews Matador MP-43. Page 1 29

I bought the tire along with the tread life. 185/55/15 (made in Russia). The car is Opel Vectra A. Before I had Michelin Energy Saver. Driving style: very aggressive. Tire mileage 9000. The factory marking Matador on the tire tread has not yet worn off. Adhesion on dry road 7 out of 10. The cold tire holds the road confidently. The characteristics are preserved on a warm tire. Possibly a small scree

Yesterday I installed these tires after Yokohama A-drive. Quiet, soft, and quiet. Look nice, made solidly. Compared to the Yokohama, it’s like earth and sky. Road roughness, potholes, and dents, it’s 5 times softer to drive on, as if I changed the suspension or the car. On the Yokohama, every pothole I felt with the tail, like sitting on a stool, and it was completely worn out

Installed a week ago, drove 150 km.
Size 195/60/15
First impressions:
Holds the road well, good traction, aquaplaning not tested as it's dry.
Disadvantages: At low speed (5-10 km/h) on rough asphalt the whole car vibrates, though on other speeds it's normal. Can't compare noise level, as the winter one is quite quiet on all modes and

Good tyre. Not worse than overseas analogues. Have been Bridgestones, Hankooks...The price is just fine, I bought it for 2500 against 3500-4000 for imports. Does not float on wet asphalt, holds the road perfectly. Don't regret buying it, even though I was planning for a Bridgestone.

Hi there. I'd like to share my impressions about this tire. It's simply excellent for those who love to take sharp turns at high speeds of 120-160 km/h. It handles the road beautifully on a wet road, doesn't hydroplane and doesn't oversteer or understeer, and brakes well on a wet road. In short, it's an excellent budget option for a high-performance tire. Although it was a bit stiff at first, after getting broken in, it

sturdy

I put 195/50 R15 on the ninth, the price was decent (270 UAH), so I took a risk. I moved Kleber HP2 to the rear axle. Many people said that compared to Kleber, there's no comparison, and that Matador has a weak sidewall, etc. I'm telling you, that's not true! I regularly drove into those damn Dnepropetrovsk potholes. I was worried, but

Great tire
Super 2nd season tire, confidently holds the track on the Volga at 180, fully demonstrates all its characteristics on wet asphalt. On our roads, it goes smoothly, no potholes are heard. Price/quality ratio = 5+++
Pros: Soft
Cons: none

Good price/quality ratio

Driven 30,000 km. I'm satisfied with the tire. For the money I paid, it turned out to be a very good option. Even with a tread residual of 3 mm, confident braking on wet roads. The main drawback is that it's very noisy.

Excellent
I've been driving on these tires since April, I've covered about 40,000 km. I'm happy with the tires, they're great on any surface, except for mud. They handle the road well, and aren't afraid of potholes. Plus, the price is a bonus. I recommend them.
Pros: price - quality
Cons: mud

Great tire, I compare it to the Bridgestone 250 and Yokohama A-Drive. The Aqua's prefix lives up to its name 110%, no aquaplaning, stays in the groove in the rain without a hitch, doesn’t oversteer, 120-130 km/h in the rain, 160 km/h on dry roads. It's quiet, enters turns smoothly at 100-130 km/h, holds well. After driving about 30,000 km