Кама 505

1033
Hot

Tire specifications

Manufacturer
Кама (Россия)
Vehicle type
Легковые автомобили
Seasonality
Winter
Spikes
Yes
On sale since
2006 г.
Tire class
E
Tire type
Бюджетные
Fuel consumption
E...F
Handling
C...E
Noisiness
72...73
Description

Technologies

Technology Directional tread elements
Directional tread elements
Directional elements improve snow traction
Technology Shoulder elements
Shoulder elements
Shoulder elements increase wheel durability
Technology Four longitudinal grooves
Four longitudinal grooves
Tread grooves quickly and efficiently remove water and mud flows from the contact patch
Technology Reinforced sidewall
Reinforced sidewall
The sidewall increases the protection of the rubber from accidental damage

In stock and to order

ModificationAvailabilityPrice
Кама 505 175/65 R14 82T-14%3 520 
Кама 505 185/60 R14 82T Hot-15%3 290 
Кама 505 185/60 R14 82Q -13%3 630 
Кама 505 195/65 R15 91Q-14%3 670 
Recommended 93%

Reviews 1026

Add a feedback
Dry road
Wet road
Snow
Ice
Comfort
Course stability
Silent
Rate
Braking
Aquaplaning
Speed
Wearability
Quality
Price/performance
4.61 / 5
  • about tyre Кама 505

    Rate
    3.1

    Tires for 2 seasons, on average, 25-30t.km. Currently, the tire is breaking down at 100km. Riding with vibrations, wishing you good health. Not suited for balancing (uneven tread). No studs at all, 50%. And honestly, I think you can't find a better option for such money.

    Vehicle:
    VAZ Priora (2170)  1.5L  2007-2009
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 505

    Rate
    2.5

    I've done 2 full seasons on them, though I won't be putting new ones on for next year, as they don't hold on ice and are as loud as a fighter jet, plus one of the tires has now developed a flat spot. Before this, the Nords were a much better handling tire.

    Vehicle:
    VAZ 2114  1.5L  2001-2008
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 505

    Rate
    4.2

    The tire has changed a lot over the last 5 years, I bought the first set back in 2006 or 2007 and I'd be honest, it was a three out of ten. I took a pair in September and it's a different story altogether. It handles well on asphalt, isn't afraid of snow or ice, and doesn't chatter on rough roads. It seems the tire manufacturers have changed the compound and made a very decent budget tire out of it.

    Vehicle:
    VAZ 2110  1.5L  1996-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability

Tests 5

  • Winter tire tread test 175/65 R14 11

    Publisher:
    «За рулём»
    Year:
    2012
    Medium Braking Performance on Snow and Dry Asphalt
    The weakest braking characteristics on ice
    Poor acceleration and cross-grip on ice and snow
    Weak braking properties on wet asphalt
    Problematic handling on slippery surfaces
    Poor directional stability on a snowy road
    High noise level
    Very stiff tires
    Increased fuel consumption
    Points: 776

    Suitable only for well-cleaned roads.
  • Winter tire test of size 175/65 R14 5

    Publisher:
    «За рулём»
    Year:
    2010
    Good snow and dry asphalt braking
    Satisfactory steering stability on any road surface
    Modest cross-country traction on ice and snow
    Braking on wet asphalt
    Problematic handling on winter roads
    Low level of comfort
    Suitable for any winter roads.

    Price/quality ratio: 2.45
    Points: 837
  • Winter tire tread durability test 175/65 R14 8

    Publisher:
    «За рулём»
    Year:
    2008
    Satisfactory on-road traction, comfort level, and directional stability on asphalt.
    Weak brakes on ice and snow, lateral traction properties on ice and packed snow
    difficult handling on winter roads
    Recommended for winter roads, partially covered with snow and ice.
  • Winter tyre test 195/65 R15 8

    Publisher:
    «За рулём»
    Year:
    2008
    Good traction
    Satisfactory handling on snow-covered roads
    Steering stability on slippery roads
    Poor acceleration on ice
    Poor brakes and poor directional stability on asphalt
    Increased fuel consumption
    Recommended for any winter road.
  • Winter tire test of Russian studded tires 195/65 R15 3

    Publisher:
    «За рулём»
    Year:
    2009
    Good longitudinal traction on ice
    Good snow braking
    Poor handling on slippery roads

    Low level of passability

    Median course stability on any road

    Low level of comfort
    Recommended for any winter road