Winter tire test 175/65 R14 from the publisher За рулём 2013 p.
| Place |
Model |
Description / Recommendations |
Cost |
|
1
|
|
-
- Outstanding winter traction
excellent fuel efficiency high level of comfort good road holding on asphalt.
-
- average braking performance on asphalt
-
- Lead in most indicators.
Scores: 952
|
from 6 980 ₽ |
|
2
|
|
-
- Good traction on snow and ice
outstanding handling and directional stability on winter roads low fuel consumption high level of comfort.
-
- weak at braking on asphalt
not the best directional stability in summer low cross-country ability
-
- For any road, comfortable and economical.
Points: 908
|
from 8 170 ₽ |
|
3
|
|
-
- Good traction on snow and ice
Braking on dry and wet asphalt Summer stability Treadmiles
-
- Increased fuel consumption at a speed of 90 km/h
-
- For any roads and winter off-road.
Points: 907
|
from 6 290 ₽ |
|
4
|
|
-
- Low fuel consumption
good handling and traction
-
- Poor braking performance on wet asphalt
-
- For snowy and icy roads.
Points: 878
|
from 5 271 ₽ |
|
5
|
|
-
- Good traction on snow
best braking performance on dry pavement in summer moderate fuel economy.
-
- poor handling
weak passability low comfort level
-
- For any winter road.
Scores: 867
|
from 5 320 ₽ |
|
6
|
|
-
- Fuel efficiency
good handling stability on asphalt low noise level
-
- Ambiguous directional stability on snowy roads
stiff on the move
-
- For any winter roads.
Points: 858
|
from 5 850 ₽ |
|
7
|
|
-
- Outstanding braking performance on dry asphalt and excellent dry cornering stability.
-
- poor traction on ice
high fuel consumption difficult handling and directional stability
-
- For cleaned asphalt roads.
Scores: 826
|
from 3 090 ₽ |
|
8
|
|
-
- Fuel efficiency
good course stability on asphalt and smooth runability
-
- weak traction and braking properties on asphalt
complicated handling and stability mediocre cross-country ability
-
- Only for leisurely driving, economical.
Points: 802
|
from 5 660 ₽ |