Winter tire test 175/65 R14 from the publisher За рулём 2011 p.

Place	Description / Recommendations	Cost
1	Nokian Hakkapeliitta R Outstanding acceleration on snow, lateral traction on ice, best-in-class handling on any winter road Thrilling responsiveness Good traction Lowest fuel consumption Mediocre braking on dry asphalt Low level of comfort Good on any winter road. Economical. Points: 929	—
2	Continental ContiVikingContact 5 Best acceleration on ice and snow, speed on a snowy road and a good stopping distance on a dry and wet road Excellent handling on asphalt Good to very good handling Stiff Safe in any conditions. Points: 921	from 6 290 ₽
3	Michelin X-Ice 2 Best braking on ice and snow Lateral traction on ice Stable course on snowy roads Low fuel consumption Modest braking performance on dry asphalt Most balanced. Suitable for those who value fuel efficiency. Scores: 914	—
4	Bridgestone Blizzak REVO GZ Good braking performance on snow and ice, course stability on any winter road Easy handling Fuel-efficient at high speed. Low cross-country traction on ice, passability and comfort level Weak braking on wet asphalt For rolled winter roads. In the fields - no-no. Points: 887	from 5 320 ₽
5	Cordiant Polar SL Mid-braking and cornering properties on ice The worst braking on dry and wet asphalt Weak braking properties on ice and snow Low directional stability on asphalt Poor cross-country ability Suitable for a leisurely ride on partially icy and snowy roads. Score: 845	from 2 890 ₽
6	Amtel NordMaster CL Optimal braking performance on dry and wet asphalt Good handling on asphalt. Very weak traction properties on ice and snow Problematic directional stability and handling on snow Low passability, uncomfortable, provoke increased fuel consumption Suitable as "demiseasonal shoes". Points: 823	—