Test of all-season tires 185/65 R15 from the publisher ADAC 2026 p.
| Place |
Model |
Description / Recommendations |
Cost |
|
1
|
|
-
- Good handling and high traction in any conditions
Low weight Excellent fuel economy
-
- Slightly reduced tread life
-
- Verdict: Good
|
— |
|
2
|
|
-
- Good performance on dry and wet pavement
High mileage Good fuel efficiency
-
- Reduced traction in winter conditions
Increased weight
-
- Verdict: Satisfactory
|
— |
|
2
|
|
-
- Good performance on dry pavement and in winter conditions
High mileage Very light Good fuel efficiency
-
- Slightly reduced grip on a wet road
-
- Verdict: Satisfactory
|
from 6 700 ₽ |
|
4
|
|
-
- Good performance on dry and wet surfaces
High mileage Low weight Good fuel efficiency
-
- Insufficient good handling on snow
Relatively long braking distance on dry pavement
-
- Verdict: Satisfactory
|
— |
|
5
|
|
-
- Good performance on dry pavement
High mileage Good fuel efficiency
-
- Insufficient good handling on wet surfaces and snow
-
- Verdict: Satisfactory
|
from 4 320 ₽ |
|
6
|
|
-
- Good performance on wet pavement and in winter conditions
High mileage Decent economy
-
- Relatively weak results on dry pavement
-
- Verdict: Satisfactory
|
from 4 620 ₽ |
|
8
|
|
-
- Acceptable performance on wet surfaces
Good fuel efficiency
-
- Relatively low performance on dry pavement
Insufficiently good handling on snow Reduced tread life Heavy
-
- Verdict: Satisfactory
|
— |
|
9
|
|
-
- Economical
-
- Relatively weak results on snow and wet surfaces
Weak results on dry surfaces Reduced tread life Increased weight
-
- Verdict: Average
|
— |
|
10
|
|
-
- Very good performance in winter conditions
Lightweight and economical
-
- Poor performance on wet and, in particular, dry pavement
Reduced mileage
-
- Verdict: Mediocre
|
— |
|
11
|
|
-
- Decent fuel economy
-
- Reduced traction in any conditions
Reduced mileage
-
- Verdict: Mediocre
|
— |
|
12
|
|
-
- Good performance on dry pavement
High mileage Relatively low weight Good fuel efficiency
-
- Poor traction on wet surfaces and, in particular, on snow
-
- Verdict: Not recommended
|
— |
|
13
|
|
-
- Good performance on wet surface
High mileage Economical
-
- Low traction on dry pavement and, in particular, on snow
High mass
-
- Verdict: Not Recommended
|
— |
|
13
|
|
-
- Decent fuel economy
-
- Poor traction on dry and wet surfaces
Very poor traction in winter conditions Reduced lifespan Increased weight
-
- Verdict: Not recommended
|
— |
|
15
|
|
-
- Economical
-
- Poor traction on dry and wet surfaces
Very poor traction in winter conditions Reduced tread life Increased weight
-
- Verdict: Not recommended
|
— |
|
16
|
|
-
- Low weight
Good fuel efficiency
-
- Poor traction on dry and wet surfaces
Very poor traction in winter conditions Reduced mileage
-
- Verdict: Not recommended
|
— |