Test of all-season tires 225/45 R17 from the publisher ADAC 2025 p.

Place Model Description / Recommendations Cost
1
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Good handling at the limit of grip on dry pavement
High level of safety in soft winter conditions
High mileage
Low fuel consumption
Relatively heavy
Balanced all-season tires, the only ones in the test that managed to get "Good" for both safety and environmental friendliness
1
Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons GEN-3
Safe behavior on wet asphalt
Very high mileage
Low weight
Low fuel consumption
Minor claims to handling on dry road and snow
Goodyear does not have the most accurate steering response on dry pavement at summer temperatures, but overall the tires provide an acceptable level of safety, and in addition, they received particularly high ratings for braking and handling on wet roads, as well as for environmental friendliness
from 4 620 
3
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Good level of safety on dry and wet surfaces
High mileage
Low fuel consumption
Relatively inaccurate steering response on dry pavement
Not the highest grip in winter conditions
Increased weight
Bridgestone provide a high level of safety on asphalt, but in winter conditions the indicators are not the best
from 18 350 
3
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
Good performance on dry and wet surfaces
High mileage
Low fuel consumption
Low weight
Not the best performance on snow
Apparently, the Pirelli were designed primarily to improve handling on asphalt, and on snow and ice they lose to all-season tires created with an emphasis on "winter" characteristics
5
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Good performance on dry asphalt and in winter conditions
High mileage
Low weight
Low fuel consumption
Poor results on wet asphalt
Michelin performs very well in soft winter conditions, but they have relatively weak grip on wet surfaces
from 6 700 
6
BFGoodrich Advantage All-Season
Good performance on dry asphalt and in winter conditions
Low weight
Low fuel consumption
Relatively weak results on wet pavement
Increased wear
BFGoodrich is effective on dry asphalt and snow, however, the grip on wet roads leaves much to be desired

Verdict: "Satisfactory"
6
Good braking properties and handling on wet roads
Good level of safety in winter conditions
Very high mileage
Poor performance on dry asphalt
Reduced resistance to aquaplaning
Dunlop stood out with good driving characteristics on snow, but on dry and wet asphalt the indicators are not so high

Verdict: "Satisfactory"
8
Long lifespan
Good fuel efficiency
Relatively low performance on dry and wet asphalt, as well as in winter conditions
Decent tires that in terms of grip yield to more premium products in not all types of coverage, but still do not have obvious drawbacks

Verdict: "Satisfactory"
9
High mileage
Low fuel consumption
Poor results on dry pavement
Relatively poor results on wet pavement and in winter conditions
High weight
Vredestein performed moderately on wet asphalt, snow, and ice, and on dry pavement the indicators are even lower, and more could be expected from tires of this brand

Verdict: "Average"
10
Barum Quartaris 5
Good performance in winter conditions
High mileage
Low fuel consumption
Poor performance on dry pavement
Relatively poor performance on wet pavement
Although Barum is produced by Continental, the tires have an obviously reduced grip on asphalt, especially on dry

Verdict: "Mediocre"
from 5 330 
10
Good performance in winter conditions
Low fuel consumption
Poor performance on dry pavement
Relatively poor performance on wet pavement
Reduced tread life
Increased weight
Although Nexen has substantially improved the characteristics of its tires in recent years, this time their model received a low rating for overall safety level

Verdict: "Mediocre"
10
Good performance in winter conditions
Low fuel consumption
Low weight
Poor performance on dry and wet asphalt
Tires have an imbalance of characteristics, and if everything is fine in winter conditions, then on asphalt they have clearly low results

Verdict: "Average"
13
High mileage
Poor results on dry and wet asphalt
Frankly poor results in winter conditions
If on asphalt, CST tires from Maxxis still more or less cope with their tasks, the grip on snow is extremely low, so these tires cannot be considered all-season

Verdict: "Poor"
14
Aplus AS909
Very high mileage
Low cost per kilometer
Very low fuel consumption
Poor performance on dry asphalt
Dangerously long braking distance on wet road
Aplus have excelled in very high mileage and excellent fuel efficiency, but it cannot compensate for the very long braking distance on wet pavement, creating a safety hazard

Verdict: "Poor"
from 6 060 
15
Arivo Carlorful A/S
High mileage
Low fuel consumption
Poor performance on dry surface
Dangerously long braking distance on wet surface
Tires cannot provide an acceptable level of safety due to low braking efficiency on wet roads

Verdict: "Poor"
from 2 130 
16
Petlas Multi Action PT565
High mileage
Low fuel consumption
Poor results on dry and wet surfaces
Unacceptably low grip on snow
Petlas cannot be attributed to all-season tires, as they are absolutely not suitable for driving on snow. The results on asphalt are also weak

Verdict: "Poor"