Tire test class MT in size 265/75 R16 from the publisher DriveOut 2016 p.

In recent years, tire manufacturers have been increasingly focusing on comfort, updating their ranges of All-Terrain and Highway-Terrain tires. In 2014, Drive Out already tested AT tires. However, the mud tires, also known as Mud-Terrain, are still available on the market, which are closest to the original off-road tires, and are more aggressive in design than more "civilized" tires in the AT and HT categories. MT tires are specially designed for the most extreme
Place Model Description / Recommendations Cost
1
Goodyear Wrangler MT/R with Kevlar
price
Points: 234.29

Goodyear excelled in all tests, which is why they were recognized as the best. The pilot characterized the clear leader as a model for any conditions, and although it is quite expensive, it's worth it.
2
BFGoodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM2
Off-road performance
Side wall durability
braking
wet handling
Points: 232.22

Despite their stiff construction and aggressive tread, the BFGoodrich actually proved to be quite quiet on the asphalt. The tires have mediocre braking performance and unstable handling on wet roads, but they are excellent for off-road driving, and the durability of their sidewalls is simply incredible.
from 15 370 
3
Achilles Desert Hawk XMT
Price
Side walls
unstable behavior on asphalt
Score: 221.71

Although Achilles is a budget brand, the capabilities of these tires off-road are impressive, especially considering the price. Achilles isn't very stable on pavement, but the robust sidewalls ultimately allowed it to break into the top three.
4
balance
Sidewall strength
Points: 218.01

After General Grabber AT won the previous Drive Out test, very high expectations were associated with the MT-class tires, but although they performed evenly in all disciplines, they failed to impress in any of them. The sidewall durability was also disappointing, considering they have a 3-layer construction.
5
Hankook RT03 Dynapro MT
Performance on Gravel and Asphalt
Sidewall durability
Points: 215.82

The Korean company continues to impress - their tires performed well in both of the last two tests, which speaks to the consistently high quality of their products. This time, Hankook impressed on asphalt and gravel, and if not for the relatively low sidewall durability, they would have taken a leading position in this test.
6
Yokohama Geolandar M/T G001
Good results on wet asphalt.
poor traction on rocky slope
Points: 210.53

Although Yokohama had relatively good results on wet asphalt, they were let down by their poor grip on the rocky slope.
7
Dunlop GrandTrek MT2
Tire price
behaviour on asphalt
Off-road performance
Weak sidewall strength
Points: 208.5

Dunlop tires, which were the cheapest in the test, surprised with high performance on asphalt, but they have weak sidewall durability and not very good off-road performance.
8
Bridgestone Dueler M/T 674
Tire behavior on asphalt
behavior on gravel
sidewall durability
Points: 208.33

On asphalt, everything was not so bad, and Bridgestone provided good controllability, but on gravel the situation changed drastically, and besides, the tires have insufficiently robust sidewalls
from 14 960 
9
Kumho Road Venture MT KL71
Wet asphalt braking
Low ride quality
Points: 201.17

Tires of the Korean brand so far cannot be compared with the market leaders, and the pilot noted that they have insufficiently good braking efficiency on wet asphalt and low ride quality.
from 9 820 
10
Nankang N889
Unpredictability of behavior on a wet surface
Points: 169.72

Nankang failed to perform well in any of the tests, and it finally became clear when the tires couldn't even climb a hill at the minimum pressure level. Additionally, according to the driver, on wet surfaces the tires behave unpredictably, worsen the comfort level, and are poorly controlled during braking.